🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like much of federal military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.